and of course the formatting is all fucked
from https://media.defense.gov/2020/Oct/02/2002509989/-1/-1/0/CIM_3010_24A.PDF
COMDTINST M3010.24A
1-9
The NRF is organized into three parts: the base document, Emergency
Support Function
(ESF) Annexes, and Support Annexes. The NRF organizes resources and
capabilities into 14
ESFs. Additional information on ESFs and the Coast Guard's roles and
responsibilities with
regard to them is located in Chapter 6. The Support Annexes include
supporting processes
and considerations for incident response.
1. Response - Federal Interagency Operational Plan (FIOP). The NRF
features the basis for
an integrated approach to synchronize planning efforts and clarify
agency roles and
responsibilities while serving as a foundation for more detailed
federal agency-specific
plans and operating procedures. The Response FIOP expands upon the
NRF, detailing
how the federal government delivers core capabilities for the mission
areas outlined in
the NPG and built upon NIMS concepts and principles reflecting the
whole community
concept.
The Response FIOP includes Incident-Specific Annexes. These annexes expand the
concepts within the Response FIOP to describe the missions, policies,
responsibilities,
and coordination processes across incident management and emergency response
operations for a wide spectrum of potential notice or no-notice
incidents, which require
specialized or unique responses such as chemical and oil response.
2. Stafford Act versus Non-Stafford Act and PPD-44. The NRF addresses
all domestic
response incidents in an all-hazards approach. Various federal
departments and agencies
hold statutory authority and jurisdiction to lead government response
activities for
specific incidents. For example, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and
Emergency Relief
Act (Stafford Act) with FEMA acting as the lead federal agency guides
natural disasters.
Likewise, the Coast Guard and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hold similar
authorities to respond to environmental contamination , with the USCG
as the lead for
coastal response and the EPA as the lead for inland response, under
the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (National Contingency
Plan, NCP).
Recent incidents, to include the Flint Michigan water crisis and the
Southern Border
response, illustrated the need for more robust planning and
coordination across the
federal government for those incidents that do not fall under the
purview of the Stafford
Act. As a result, the release of Domestic Incident Response,
Presidential Policy Directive
44 (PPD-44) builds upon the guidance for Non-Stafford Act response
outlined in the
NRF and recognize the Lead Federal Agency (LFA) for given incident
types. The timely
identification of a LFA enhances the government's ability to form
effective coordinating
structures to manage a response and delineate lead roles.
No comments:
Post a Comment