Re: revisiting the karen read cellphone tracking discussion

didnt I post a followup on this? maybe not

1. the accuracy of john okeefes phone seemed to be mostly 10 feet
while enroute to 34 fairview - unknown what the exact lats longs were
- data was appended maybe - we did not see that data

2. john okeefe phone apparently was sending location data once every second

3. john okeefe phone lost accuracy for approx 6 pings and then stopped moving

we were thinking that maybe john okeefe threw his phone at karen read
suv - hit the taillight and broke the taillight- and then the phone
bounced onto the lawn - john okeefe then went inside 34 fairview and
was beaten to death - or maybe someone met john okeefe at the door of
34 fairview - took his phone from him - and threw it onto the lawn

here is my explanation of "accuracy" - definitions - infrastructure =
celltowers and satellites and computers and internet that links it all
together - apparently the cell towers send out a signal every second
to a cellphone - the cellphone plots its location via gps and sends
that location to the cell tower - the cellphone might also plot its
location by comparing the signal from multi cell towers - when the
celltower receives the return reply from the cellphone with the lats
and longs - the infrastructure can calculate the difference between
where the phone says it is based on gps or tower - and where the
infrastructure detects it to be (based on multi delays to receive the
signal on multi cell towers) - yes its complicated

let me try to find that report by ?gauarino? again

keep in mind - the cellphone has a much 'harder' time seeing the
celltowers and gps satellites when inside a car - or in a house - or
when under heavy tres - or in a snowstorm - etc - the signals mostly
travel in straight lines - and the signals are weakened / attenuated
by heavy objects and metal objects

you can search the internet for the terms - land mobile radio and emf
and radio wave propagation

this is all based on some document that we were viewing - unknown how
reliable the info is - apparently the data was from a msp detective -
maybe guarino

On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 5:09 PM Peteri Szerlagi <zerg90@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20240111053235/https://twitter.com/OliviaLambo_/status/1745255334715785636
>
> olivia lambo says that the detectives just used 6 data points from
> john okeefes cellphone - with accuracys from 30 meters to 60 meters -
> to state that okeefe did not enter the home at 34 fairview rd
>
> its only about 30 feet from the street to the front door of the home -
> and 30 meters is equivalent to 120 geet - so it seems to me that the
> cellphone data might be very misleading
>
> one would expect that the lats/longs from the cellphone in the car
> would be less reliable by a longshot than the cellphone long lats when
> being carried between the car and the home - access to towers and
> satellites should be much easier in the open than when within a motor
> vehicle - one would think
>
> anyone have better info on this?
>
> --
> shes got a kid ... together -
> https://youtu.be/IQQ-hxIwm70?si=8jrwZRcfZg-vN4Ye&t=237